Legal Opinion
I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.
This action is brought to restrain interference with plaintiff’s quiet use and enjoyment of premises and for damages for such unwarranted interference prior to this action. Plaintiff corporation is lessee of the street level floor and that immediately above it under a 21-year lease from 1949 to October 31, 1970. The. premises are 208 Central Park South. Defendant 210 Central Park South Corp. is the owner and Carol Management Corp. is managing agent. Defendant Alfred Kaskel owns and controls both corporate defendants. Plaintiff had for some years operated a restaurant in the leased premises…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Adams-Flanigan Co. v. . KlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Adams-Flanigan Co. v. KlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Bedell v. EdgettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foureal Co. v. National Molding Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 1973