Legal Opinion

Gene Floyd Criswell v. Howard M. Comstock, Superintendent, Sierra Conservation Center, Jamestown, Raymond K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections, Gene Floyd Criswell v. Peter J. Pitchess, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1968No. 21833_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

396 F.2d 857

Gene Floyd CRISWELL, Appellant,

v.

Howard M. COMSTOCK, Superintendent, Sierra Conservation

Center, Jamestown, Raymond K. Procunier, Director

of the Department of Corrections, Appellees.

Gene Floyd CRISWELL, Appellant,

v.

Peter J. PITCHESS, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 21833, 21805.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 4, 1968.

Gene F. Criswell (argued), in pro. per., and Joseph H. Lewis, Hollywool, Cal., for appellant.

Jack K. Weber (argued), Stanton Price, Deputy Attys. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and BROWNING,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API