Legal Opinion

Reisenberg v. Hankins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1924No. 2255Published

Appeal from District Court, Childress County; J. V. Leak, Judge. Suit by Henry Hankins and another against Robert Reisenberg. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

[11] The appellant has drawn several inferences from language of the opinion which he misconstrues, and which are altogether unwarranted and uncalled for. For instance, he insists that this court has in effect held that the failure to give personal notice of sale under a mortgage is such an irregularity as makes the sale void. We made no such holding nor is the language quoted from the opinion susceptible of any such construction. It is insisted that the plaintiff’s petition' does not charge fraud, and that we erred in holding that the allegations of the petition with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Golden v. OdiorneTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lyon & Gribble v. LoganTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Peoples v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API