Legal Opinion
Zak v. Zak
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 2, 1940PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
On January 6, 1927, the plaintiff had a deposit of $993.93 in the City Five Cents Savings Bank of Haverhill, but apprehending that the money might be attached, and for the purpose of avoiding any attachment but not for the purpose of making any gift to his wife (who is one of the defendants and will herein be referred to as the defendant) or to pay family expenses, the deposit was withdrawn by the defendant in pursuance of a written order signed by the plaintiff. After paying with his approval certain of his expenses, the defendant, on July 2, 1927, deposited in her own name, with the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lennon v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Swensen v. MarinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Noonan v. RauhCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Doody v. SpurrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.