Martin v. Durham

HANNA, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff, Gary F. Martin, appeals from a jury verdict and judgment for the defendants on his claim for personal injuries. The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in giving an oral instruction regarding hearsay evidence offered by the plaintiffs expert which commented on the plaintiffs truthfulness, in failing to sustain his motion for new trial because there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to sustain a verdict for the defendant, and in failing to grant a mistrial because of defense counsel’s questions, which were in violation of the court’s…