Legal Opinion

Voigt Brewery Co. v. Pacifico

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1905No. Docket No. 134PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Summary proceedings by the Voigt Brewery Company, Limited, against Louis (Luciano) Pacifico to recover the possession of a certain building. There was judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, and complainant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Chester, the owner of a tenement in Detroit, leased it from month to month to Pacifico, a saloon keeper. Pacifico purchased beer of the Mutual Brewery Company of Detroit, and was indebted to it for money advanced to pay his license as a saloon keeper. Mr. Voigt was a brewer doing business under the name of the Voigt Brewery Company, Limited; and in June, 1903, an agent of Voigt (one Preetz) induced Pacifico to sell Voigt’s beer. It was agreed that Voigt should lease the place of Chester, fit up the saloon with better' fixtures, and advance Pacifico some money. Chester was to indorse a note *285the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stirling v. HeintzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Chapman ContractingMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Detroit Independent Sprinkler Co. v. Plywood Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Derek v. ElderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Derek v. ElderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Miller v. Chapman ContractingMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API