Legal Opinion

(HC) Samm v. Jones

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 14, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01987Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STERLING SAMM, No. 2:24-cv-1987 DJC CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 GENA JONES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. This action was 18 referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 10, 2024, 19 respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on the grounds that the habeas petition fails to 20 state a viable claim for relief arguing petitioner’s claims are unintelligible. (ECF No. 10.) On 21 October…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API