Legal Opinion

Adams v. Looney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1954Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

This appeal presents a case rising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, by which Adams sought compensation for personal injuries sustained during his employment as a timber cutter for Looney, who was admittedly operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Trial Judge awarded compensation, and the defendant perfected this appeal. Numero ns errors are assigned but they fail to comply with Rule 14, 185 Tenn. 866, and we will not consider them severally as the appeal presents but two questions: (1) whether there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the nature and extent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Crane Enamelware Co. v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. White v. Tennessee Coach Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Southern Mfg. Co. v. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API