Legal Opinion

Stengl v. Starr Brothers

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1938No. 24781. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Florence Stengl filed her complaint' in the circuit court of Macoupin county to recover damages for the past use of a twelve-foot strip of land of which she claimed ownership, and for an injunction restraining Starr Brothers from using the land or interfering with her right and title thereto. The parties stipulated that Mrs. Stengl is the owner of the fee in the strip but Starr Brothers claim that the strip had become a public alley by prescription. The chancellor granted an injunction but denied recovery of damages for past use of the land, and a direct appeal to this court followed. A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bontz v. StearIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Thorworth v. ScheetsIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Phillips v. LeiningerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Town of Brushy Mound v. McClintockIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Koch v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Carson v. MateykaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Hamilton v. Village of McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. The PEOPLE v. WaitkusIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Batchelder Co. v. GustafsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. City of Jacksonville v. PadgettIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API