Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Terra

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1981No. 512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing alleged drugs and drug paraphernalia seized without a warrant by county agents who had accompanied federal agents during the execution of a federal warrant to search the premises for a machine gun. The lower court agreed with the Commonwealth that there was probable cause to support the issuance of the federal warrant, but it rejected the Commonwealth’s argument that the county agents’ seizure of the drugs was justified by the “plain view” doctrine of Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. SchillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. DoriaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API