Bush v. State

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

Thomas Bush was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred in restricting his cross-examination of a witness, admitting cocaine evidence for which the state had not established a chain of custody, and improperly sentencing him. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm.

1. Bush challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, 1 the evidence showed that on March…