Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Merritt v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 2, 2010No. Record 1871-08-1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcCLANAHAN, J.

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that Merritt’s argument regarding his motion to suppress was not preserved and in the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict for after-discovered evidence. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of the convictions. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, Commonwealth v. Hudson, 265 Va. 505, 514, 578 S.E.2d 781, 786 (2003), I disagree the evidence was insufficient for the jury to conclude Merritt was guilty.

Merritt and Bolton arrived at a bus station known as a major pipeline of narcotics into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Foster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Dunn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API