Legal Opinion
Ramirez Matias v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 13, 2015No. 14-1056PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction — and those limits demand strict adherence. As we explain below, the petitioner crosses this jurisdictional line.
The petitioner’s claims of error can be divided into two tranches. The first tranche involves an agency decision under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), see Pub.L. No. 105-100, §§ 201-204, 111 Stat. 2160, 2196-2201 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 8 U.S.C.) — a decision that Congress has removed from the jurisdiction of the Article III courts. See 8 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Makhoul v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Jianli Chen v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Elysee v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Meng Hua Wan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Ayeni v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arias Minaya v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Garcia-Cruz v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Mele v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Alvizures-Gomes v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Moreno v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.