Legal Opinion

Shinall v. Worrell

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1970No. Civ. 916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

This is a suit against the state in the Ex parte Young 1 tradition to have a North Carolina Statute of statewide application declared unconstitutional. In addition, plaintiffs seek monetary damages from Cumberland County District Judge Dupree on the theory that he acted in bad faith and ultra vires his judi cial office in purported enforcement of the Statute in question-. 2

The Statute under attack is North Carolina General Statutes § 14-189.1 entitled “Obscene Literature and Exhibitions.” We hold the Statute unconstitutional on its face and void because it abridges the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Collier v. MenzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1982
  5. Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API