Legal Opinion
Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 10, 2026No. 3:22-cv-00521Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO REBECCA SCOFIELD, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00521-REP Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ASHLEY GUILLARD, ATTORNEY FEES (Dkt. 151) Defendant. DEFENDANT’S RULE 60(b)(3) MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGMENT DUE TO FRAUD (Dkt. 153) Pending before the Court are (i) Plaintiff Rebecca Scofield’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 151); and (ii) Defendant Ashley Guillard’s Rule 60(b)(3) Motion for Relief of Judgment Due to Fraud (Dkt. 153). Because the Court conclusively finds that the decisional process would not be significantly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Shannon Casey v. Albertson's Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Beaudry Motor Co. v. Abko Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.