Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Jones

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Red Willow county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. Matthews v. Sowle, 12 Neb., 398. Fultz v. Winter, 9 Pac. Rep., 316. Stillman v. Fitzgerald, 33 N. W. Rep., 564. Webb v. Paxton,- 32 Id., 749. McDonald v. Boeing, 5 Id., 439. Williams v. McGraw, 18 Id., 227. Potvin v. Curran, 13 Neb., 304. Martley v. Dorr & Co., 15 Id., 452. Anderson v. Cox, 16 Id., 10. Newman v. Mueller, 16 Id., 523.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This action Avas for the recovery of the sum of $200, .alleged to be due defendant in error from plaintiff in error, as commissions, or brokerage, in the sale of certain real ■estate.

The petition alleged, that defendant in error was employed by plaintiff in error as such agent, and that during his employment he procured a purchaser for the property, who was accepted by plaintiff in error, and to whom the property was sold, and for which services plaintiff in error became indebted to him.

The answer consisted of a general denial of each and every allegation in the petition.

A trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potvin v. Curran & ChaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. ClarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lewis v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Peters v. DregerNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API