Legal Opinion

Kaplow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 1963No. 3759PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Judge.

The appellants, Irving Kaplow and Horace Wilson, are appealing from conviction and sentence for unlawfully forging a mortgage deed with intent to defraud Edwin F. Buck and his wife, Barbara J. Several points were presented in appellants’ briefs and in their argument, but error has been shown in only one instance. We therefore limit ourselves to a discussion of this point alone, which is: Whether the trial court committed reversible error by allowing the State, over objection, to call one of the defendants being prosecuted to the stand as a witness for the State. On this point…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert William Maloney, Robert Murphy and Paul MerrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. HissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. De Gesualdo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. United States v. Charles Stewart TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Tsavaris v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Hankerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API