Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Cherry

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 5, 1934No. 5322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Cantor, the claiming creditor, was the owner of certain premises in Philadelphia. He leased the property to the bankrupts, trading as Nathan Bloch Sons Company, for one year from February 14, 1931.

The lease provided that . either party might terminate the relationship by giving written notice thirty days before the expiration of the lease; that, if no notice was given, the lease continued for another year; and that, if the lessee should become a bankrupt, the rent for the term would become due and payable immediately.

The lessee entered into possession of the premises, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colman Co. v. WithoftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Adams v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. In re TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ingels v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Alfonso Valdes v. Jose M. Feliciano, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  3. In Re Mercury Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API