Legal Opinion
Joers v. Department of Health & Social Services
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1974No. 105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The state Department of Health & Social Services has no right to recover on its claim for the period in question. It is undisputed that the defendant Grams is being held only pursuant to a pending criminal charge. There has been no appropriate civil commitment proceedings which would result in an obligation under sec. 46.10 (2), Stats., as claimed by the state.
We have carefully considered the cases upon which the state relies. They are Guardianship of Sprain (1935), 219 Wis. 591, 263 N. W. 648; Guardianship of Radoll (1936), 222 Wis. 539, 269 N. W. 305; and Treglown v. Department of Health…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Matalik v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Haskins v. County Court of DodgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Treglown v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Bank of Sturgeon Bay v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Koyce v. State, Central Collection UnitCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Boldt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- In re the Commitment of F.H.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.