Legal Opinion

Madden v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The action js on a war risk insurance-policy of the yearly renewable type, by the administratrix of the insured, Patrick Madden. The United States admits liability on the policy, but contends that the-unpaid balance of the policy, $5,267.10, is-not payable to the petitioner but is payable to another.

The facts are undisputed. Patrick Madden, the insured, took out the pokey in ' 1918, naming himself as beneficiary.. The policy later lapsed, but was reinstated in the face amount of $9,856.41, and. *535was in effect at his death on July 19, 1922. The insured died a resident…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Singleton v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. McCullough v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Reivich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  5. Hatch v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCormickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. Day v. BradshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API