Legal Opinion

Seely v. Neill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 4995; No. 2542 C. APublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, the District Court of Weld County. Hon. Christian A. Bennett, Judge. Action by William M. Neill and James E. Neill, copartners doing business under the firm name , and style of Neill Brothers, against Kate S. Seely, May H. Seely, Kate S. Seely as guardian of George H. Seely, minor heir of Joseph S. Seely, deceased, and The Seely Lake Recreation and Amusement Company, a corporation. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steele

Suit was brought by the plaintiffs (appellees here) to enforce a mechanics’ lien on certain land situate in Weld county. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs, at the special instance and request of The Seely Lake Recreation and Amusement Company, furnished certain materials for the erection and repair of a dwelling house, bath house, ice house, dancing pavilion, office, and other buildings upon the premises mentioned in the complaint; that the materials were furnished between the 19th day of' May, 1900, and the 28th day of August in said year, to the *200value of $864.00, and that no- part…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Independent Trust Corp. v. Stan Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK IN FT. COLLINS v. Sam McClure & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Robert Garrett Lumber Co. v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Stan Miller, Inc. v. Breckenridge Resort Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API