Legal Opinion
In re Annexation of Slaterville
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided April 18, 1949No. 6032PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, District Judge.
Herein the following abbreviations will be used, to wit: A.C.L.A. shall indicate Alaska Compiled Laws Annotated, 1949; C.L.A. ’33 shall indicate Compiled Laws of Alaska, 1933; C.L.A. T3 shall indicate Compiled Laws of Alaska, 1913; S.L.A. shall indicate Session Laws of Alaska.
The above cause is a proceeding to annex to the City of Fairbanks, Alaska, territory that is contiguous to it. Protestants assert that the laws of Alaska upon the subject are invalid because they grant to the Judge of the District *311Court powers which are purely legislative, and also that such laws…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Dreyer v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Binns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Forsyth v. City of HammondCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Jonathan Howell Husband R. (Roach)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- In re the Annexation to City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
- FOMB v. Pierluisi-UrrutiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- In re the Annexation to AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956