Legal Opinion

United States v. Reyes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 17, 1996No. S3 04 CR 872 (SAS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Defendant Jose Reyes (“Reyes”) has moved to suppress evidence consisting of approximately $3,800 in cash and several pieces of jewelry. For the reasons set forth below, his motion is granted.

*548I. Factual Background

A. Discussions between Vargas and Reyes at Otisville

From January 17, 1995 until February 2, 1995, Raul Vargas (“Vargas”). and Reyes were both inmates at the federal correctional facility at Otisville, New York. On several occasions while at Otisville, Reyes, Vargas, and “Nino” (Gilbert Cervantes, a defendant in a companion case) allegedly…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API