Vincent v. City of Pac. Grove
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, and the appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit, and an order denying a motion for new trial.
The facts alleged in the complaint, and not denied by the answer, are, in substance, as follows: The defendant was a municipal corporation of the sixth class, and, on September 8,1890, its board of trustees, acting under the authority of an act of the legislature commonly called the Vrooman act (Stats. 1885, p. 147), as amended in *4071889 (Stats. 1889, p. 157), passed a resolution declaring its intention to improve Laurel avenue in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of RedfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Reclamation Dist. No. 535 v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ahrens v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Glass v. Carnation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962