Gilbert v. Fosston Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
There has been a reargument of this case, not because of any objection of counsel to what was in the former opinion, but because of their view that it did not go far enough. They ask a decision which will dispose of the case finally. Our further consideration has led us to the conclusion that we should comply. The issues of fact remaining are apparent rather than real and to be solved by reference to controlling facts already established and largely by mere computation. Our further conclusions in the case are really matters of law. Counsel are right in saying that, in the interests of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dibert v. D'ArcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Hamilton v. LubukeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- In re Waddell-Entz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- In re the Trust Estate of Woods, Weeks & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Peacock v. PhilLipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gilbert v. Fosston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927