Singer v. Abrams
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from an interlocutory judgment entered in the City Court of the city of New York overruling plaintiff’s demurrers to the first and third separate and distinct defenses of the defendant’s amended answer which were as follows: “ For a further separate and first distinct defense, the defendant alleges.: “ 1. That on or about the 18th day of March, 1904, the defendant and one Isidor Weinberg were copartners in business under the firm name of Weinberg & Abrams; and that on…
Read the full summary
Appeal from an interlocutory judgment entered in the City Court of the city of New York overruling plaintiff’s demurrers to the first and third separate and distinct defenses of the defendant’s amended answer which were as follows: “ For a further separate and first distinct defense, the defendant alleges.: “ 1. That on or about the 18th day of March, 1904, the defendant and one Isidor Weinberg were copartners in business under the firm name of Weinberg & Abrams; and that on or about that day the defendant contributed or loaned to the business the sum of one thousand ($1,000) dollars. “ 2.…
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the City Court overruling plaintiff’s demurrers to the first and third separate and distinct defenses of defendant’s amended answer. The action is brought upon a promissory note made by-defendant and his partner to their order and indorsed by them as partners, and further indorsed by defendant individually. The complaint is in proper form and sets forth all the allegations necessary to constitute a cause of action. Defendant’s amended answer, after specific denials of the allegations contained in two paragraphs of the complaint, denies any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Smith v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Barnard v. Lawyers' Title InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904