Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Wilmarth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by George W. Aldrich and Jacob E. Huffman, partners as Aldrich & Huffman, against Alma E. Wilmarth. From a taxation of costs defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the decision of the clerk of this court taxing the costs in this case. The only item really in contention is one for printing the amended abstract. The appellant insists that this item should not be allowed for the reason that an amended abstract was not necessary, and is incorrect in several particulars, which the counsel for the appellant specifies. The amended abstract was, we think, necessary to present certain evidence moré fully to the court than it appeared in the original abstract; but it seems to contain also some portions of the evidence embodied in the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swenson v. ChristophersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API