Legal Opinion · Concurrence

C.D.B. v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 29, 2011No. CR-10-0013Published

1ConcurrenceWelch, Presiding Judge

I concur with the majority in this case that there was insufficient evidence to convict C.D.B. of first-degree rape; however, for the reasons that follow, I encourage the Alabama Legislature to amend § 13A-6-60, Ala.Code 1975, to eliminate “forcible compulsion” as an element of the sexual offenses in Article Four of the Criminal Code for child victims, the age of which should be determined by the legislature.

In this case, the majority correctly concludes that there was insufficient evidence tending to prove that C.D.B., who was then 14 years old, used physical force to overcome any earnest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. J.A.P. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Rider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Ex Parte WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API