Legal Opinion

Shepherd Laundries Co. v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1926No. 8868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Appellee sued appellant for a balance due upon notes — secured by chattel mortgage on the machinery — given in part payment on the sale for $2,250 by him to it of a secondhand 125 H. P. boiler and accessories, also asking foreclosure. The transaction was further evidenced by a bill of sale.

Appellant admitted the cause of action to be good, except as defeated in whole or part by the facts alleged in its answer .and cross-action.

These averments, in material substance, were that the appellee had at the time, as an inducement to it to make the purchase and with the intent that it should rely and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blythe v. SpeaksTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Graves v. HaynesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Greenwood v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Scale v. TompkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mikulik v. Southwestern Specialty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Hunter Milling Co. v. SatterwhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Robinson v. Snyder Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API