Elliott v. Hardinsburg Branch
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
Carl and Ruth Elliott, co-executors of the estate of Edith E. Lane (Estate) appeal a Washington Circuit Court order which determined a son's interest in his mother's estate is vested and subject to levy or execution.
We reverse.
In 1979, Edith E. Lane executed a will. The residuary clause provides:
All the rest and residue of my estate whether real or personal and wherever situated I will, devise and bequeath, in equal shares, to my children; Betty Locke, J. Thomas Lane, Scott Neil Lane, Joe Lee Lane & David Lane. At the time of the preparation of this Will, I have no…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Busick v. BusickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Diaz v. DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pleska v. ZakutanskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Browning & Herdrich Oil Co., Inc. v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Estate of LaneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989