Legal Opinion

BECKHAM v. TICE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2022No. 2:20-cv-05398Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH BECKHAM, : Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION : No. 20-5398 v. : : ERIC TICE, et al., : Respondents. : McHUGH, J. September 29, 2022 MEMORANDUM Pending before me is the Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Pamela A. Carlos (ECF 33), which recommends that Keith Beckham’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF 1) filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

be denied. Mr. Beckham has not filed any objections to the R&R. I agree with Judge Carlos’ conclusions, but write separately with additional observations to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API