Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davila v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1992No. 90-226Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Chief Justice

Some reasonable acquaintanceship with stated standards of criminal law for this state would provide certainty in knowledge that what in this case, under the constitution, statutes and court rules, could not happen — did happen. The trial proceeding which procedurally denied access to justice for Rudy Davila and that of his co-actor, Antonio Robinson belies acceptability by any court within Wyoming law that what occurred did, in fact, occur. From this majority’s acquiescence in denied counsel to the criminally accused, I strenuously dissent. Again in this case, the question is not so much…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API