Legal Opinion
Lundblad v. Celeste
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 22, 1985No. 84-3561Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
772 F.2d 907
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
TEVEN LUNDBLAD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD D. CELESTE, GOVERNOR; MYRL SHOEMAKER, DIRECTOR OF
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; WILLIAM NAPIER, DEPUTY
DIRECTOR; DONALD OLSEN, DIVISION CHIEF; OHIO DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
NO. 84-3561
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
8/…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.