Legal Opinion

Ambers v. Beverages & More, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 2015No. B257487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHAVEZ, J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether Civil Code section 1747.08, 1 part of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (the Credit Card Act) (§ 1747 et seq.), applies to an online purchase of merchandise that the buyer elects to pick up at the seller’s retail store. We conclude that the statute does not apply to that transaction under the circumstances presented here. We therefore affirm the judgment entered in the seller’s favor.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Michael Ambers (plaintiff) filed an unverified class action complaint against defendant Beverages & More, Inc. (BevMo),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Apple Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Blain v. Doctor's Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. PARKOWNERS ASS'N v. City of MontclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. City of Fontana v. Calif. Dept. of Tax and Fee etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API