Hammer v. Posta
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
The defendants, Dominic Posta and Leticia Posta, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, Edward Hammer. After rendering a default judgment against Leticia Posta for her failure to appear, the court found Dominic Posta liable to the plaintiff under General Statutes § 22-357 1 for injuries caused by the defendants' dog and awarded the plaintiff $30,910.30 in damages and court costs. 2 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) denied the defendant's request for a jury trial, and (2) relied on the arguments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Moye v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Giamattei v. DicerboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Royston v. FactorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. R. v. N. K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025