Legal Opinion

Pleuss v. Ronkonkoma Auto Parts, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1965Published

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) moves to dismiss so much of the amended complaint as includes the MVAIC as a party defendant. Although the plaintiff is an infant the MVAIC insists that he is nevertheless relegated by article 17-A of the Insurance Law to an arbitration proceeding. It is the infant’s contention that as an infant he cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration and, in fact, may elect to arbitrate or to sue in a common-law action.

*380The infant’s status is that of an “ insured ” person (Insurance Law, § 601, subd. i). Since section 1209 of the CPLR…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Scheck & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Graber v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Zweibel v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Johnson v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API