Legal Opinion

LaValley v. Pere Marquette Employes' Credit Union

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 27, Calendar 46,410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiff and appellant was an employee of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. The defendant is the Pere Marquette Employes’ Credit Union. The action is assumpsit, brought by plaintiff to recover his savings of many years. They had been deposited with defendant and disbursed by defendant to another without, plaintiff contends, his knowledge or consent.

Several years after the opening of the account, and in the year 1947, plaintiff Clinton LaValley changed it to a joint and survivor account with his son, Richard, both signing the instruments required. Plaintiff’s motive in so doing had to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Esling v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Davis v. Chittenden County Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1948

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keokuk Savings Bank & Trust Company v. DesvauxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Badders v. PEOPLES TRUST CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Department of Treasury v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Griffin v. Centreville Savings BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ZequeiraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API