Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Iley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2019No. 17-1269Published

1Concurrence

HARTZ, J., Circuit Judge, concurring.

I concur in the judgment and all of Judge Holmes's fine opinion except the discussion of United States v. Nash , 729 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. 2013), and United States v. Jokhoo , 806 F.3d 1137 (8th Cir. 2015). In particular, I agree with the opinion's determination that the context of the Order of the Colorado Board of Accountancy made clear that the fraudulent conduct of which Defendant was later convicted would be a violation of the terms of his probation under the Order.

In my view, Judge Holmes's opinion is fully convincing without any need for support from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Khemall JokhooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Craig NashCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API