Russell v. Woodbury
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendants, Mark and Karen Woodbury, appeal from a ruling by the Portsmouth District Court (Coffey, S.J.) that the plaintiff, Maine Mechanical, could recover $5,020 under a mechanic’s lien on the Woodburys’ home. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On September 29, 1989, Lambert Realty Ltd. (the general or principal contractor) entered into a contract to build the Woodburys’ home for an adjusted contract price of $153,462. Lambert then subcontracted with Maine Mechanical to do the plumbing and heating work on the home for a subcontract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Boulia-Gorrell Lumber Co. v. East Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Electromech, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Cudworth v. BostwickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fraser Engineering v IPS-IntegratedDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018