Legal Opinion · Dissent

The People v. Small

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1925No. 16660. — Decree affirmedPublished

1DissentJustice Duncan

After careful readings and full consideration of all the evidence in this case, including the exhibits, we are unable to concur in the decision or with the conclusion therein by the court. We deem it necessary to a clear understanding of the issues to state accurately the substantial averments or charges in the bill.

The bill as framed by the State contained one separate and distinct charge which applied to Small, only, which we will designate as the first charge and which is substantially the following:

First, that it was the duty of the defendant Small, during his term of office, to receive…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Sarah v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API