Legal Opinion

Miller v. Weiner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 21, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtPerskie, J.

This matter comes before me, on the return of a writ of certiorari to review a writ of attachment issued in purported compliance with paragraph 2, section 84, of the Practice act of 1907, as amended, and all proceedings had thereunder.

The plaintiffs’ action instituted against the defendants-prosecutors, was based upon injuries and damages caused them through the alleged negligence of the defendants. It was an automobile accident case.

Among the reasons assigned for the quashing of the writ of attachment and setting aside or vacating all proceedings thereunder, was the following: “Reason 2. It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jaudel v. SchoelzkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  2. Hisor v. VandiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Goeringer v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  4. Henry v. FreemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Jones v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API