Legal Opinion
Succession of Lamm
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 15, 1888No. 10,135Published
APPEAL from the Seventeenth District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge. Burgess, J.
1Opinion
On ArmiCATroN eor Rehearing.
Owing to the importance of the subject we have thought proper to supplement our views heretofore expressed and against which error is urged.
The application suggests, as a corollary of our opinion, that if the succession of the predeceased wife cannot be administered separately *316from that of her subsequently deceased partner in community, her heirs are denied the privilege of accepting her succession, with the benfit of inventory, and ergo our opinion is wrong.
The claimants for administration conclude their brief thus:
“ The heirs of Mrs. Lamm could sue the executrix…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Erwin v. OrillionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- O'Donald v. LobdellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
- Minors of Poultney v. BarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- State v. Judge of ProbatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Tait v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844