Legal Opinion

Getz v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1926No. 25,509PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, 0.

Action for death by wrongful act and a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant Standard Oil Company appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial, and will be intended by the term defendant unless defendant Iver-son is specifically named.

Defendant Iverson had a store at Baker in Clay county and an underground tank for kerosene. John Locken, residing at Sabin in the same county, was the agent of defendant Standard Oil Company and on Saturday February 17, 1923, came to Iverson’s store with a tank truck to deliver kerosene. He states that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. R. M. Stangeland v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaCombe v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Tofano v. McIntyreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API