Legal Opinion

Orud v. Groth

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 2002No. 00-1306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Four of the six children of Candace Dil-ley, deceased, appeal from an adverse judgment in their action to impose a constructive or resulting trust on real estate (or the proceeds thereof) that was conveyed by Candace to her daughter Nancy Groth during Candace’s lifetime. The defendants are Nancy Groth and Candace’s son, Terry Willers, their respective spouses, and a mortgagee of the property. In response to defendants’ motion for a judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 222 (now rule 1.954), the district court concluded that plaintiffs’ petition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tutt v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Roush v. Mahaska State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Lathrop v. KnoopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Below v. SkarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Holsapple v. McGrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rausch v. DevineAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Barkema v. Williams Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Orud v. GrothSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. Betty Andrews v. Alice Carter, Anthony Carter, Cassius Robinson and Dena RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API