Patterson v. Camden
Supreme Court of Missouri
JBrror to St, Louis Circuit Court. This was an action of assumpsit, commenced in the St. Louis Circuit Court in the year 1841. The declaration consisted of six counts, four of which charged the defendant, John B. Camden, as drawer of two bills of exchange, of which-the following are copies: “Exchange for $1689 35. Philadelphia, 24th October-, 1839. Six months after date of this first of exchange, second of tlie same tenor and date unpaid, pay to tbe order of Robert Patterson…
Read the full summary
JBrror to St, Louis Circuit Court. This was an action of assumpsit, commenced in the St. Louis Circuit Court in the year 1841. The declaration consisted of six counts, four of which charged the defendant, John B. Camden, as drawer of two bills of exchange, of which-the following are copies: “Exchange for $1689 35. Philadelphia, 24th October-, 1839. Six months after date of this first of exchange, second of tlie same tenor and date unpaid, pay to tbe order of Robert Patterson & Go., sixteen hundred and thirty-nine thirty-five hundredths dollars, value received, and charge the same to account…
1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge
The record and proceedings in the court below show nothing which is relied on in this court for reversing the judgment until we come to the instructions asked and refused, as well as given and excepted to. The points then which have received our consideration arise on these instructions. It will be seen by the statement of the case that the court gave the third instruction asked for by the plaintiff and refused the others, and also that the court gave the six instructions asked for by the defendant.
Without minutely noticing each one of these instructions prayed for by the plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitehead v. Bank of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Louis Gaslight Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Morton ex rel. Richardson v. Supreme Council of the Royal LeagueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Dobbins v. EdmondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- St. Joseph Union Depot Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.