Legal Opinion
Harris v. Bucher
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1914No. Civ. No. 1507PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover a balance alleged to be due from defendant to plaintiff upon an express contract for services rendered by the latter in preparing plans and specifications for and superintending the construction of a building. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals upon a bill of exceptions.
The services rendered pursuant to the contract, as shown by the complaint, were those of an architect. Section 5 of “An act to regulate the practice of architecture, ’ ’ approved March 23,-1901 (Stats. 1901, p. 641), provides that “ ... it shall be unlawful, and it shall be a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Gardner v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lacy v. County of KossuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Williams v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- City of Chicago v. WoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael Francis and Queue, LLC v. Munir Rehman and HAK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Van Wyke v. BurrowsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955