Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Commanding General

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 9, 1970No. Civ. No. 70-305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Robert?’ petition for habeas corpus relief raises issues concerning the obligations of a soldier after “[t]he Army lost [him] in its vast organization,” Beaty v. Kenan, 420 F.2d 55, 59 (9th Cir. 1969), and the right of the Army, pursuant to . 10 U.S.C. § 972,1 to require such a sol*999dier to serve a period of duty beyond the term for which he was inducted. While there is no material dispute concerning the facts in this case, the differences between the factual circumstances herein and in three other cases involving substantially the same issue — Beaty v. Kenan,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States ex rel. Brooks v. CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Craycroft v. FerrallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Craycroft v. FerrallSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Cooper v. BarkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anthony Emma v. Dewitt C. Armstrong, Iii, Brigadier General, United States Army Commanding General, Fort Devens, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Forbes v. LairdDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  3. Anthony Emma v. Dewitt C. Armstrong, Iii, Brigadier General, United States Army Commanding General, Fort Devens, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. GrantUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API