Huizar v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Due to enhancement for two previous felony convictions, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment. By three points of error, appellant urges reversal due to the denial of his motion for new trial and the erroneous admissions of police testimony and extraneous offenses. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Appellant visited C & M Sales in Rock-port, Texas and inquired about a Chevrolet station wagon that was for sale. Appellant discussed purchasing the vehicle with Phil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Hafdahl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Pifer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- John Dickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- John Dickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Pifer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.