Legal Opinion

Piedmont Plaza Investors v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. TC 4123 and TC 4124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the 1994-95 and 1995-96 assessed values of their low-income apartment properties. The properties are operated under a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program. Through agreements with the owners, the government exercises significant control over the properties in exchange for the owners receiving significant benefits. Oregon law requires that these properties be assessed at their real market value, taking into consideration any effect the governmental restrictions may have on value. ORS 308.205(2)(d). These cases focus on how to measure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
  2. Douglas County Assessor v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piedmont Plaza Investors v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wilsonville Heights Assoc., Ltd. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2003
  3. Dept. of Rev. v. Butte Creek Associates IOregon Tax Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API