Legal Opinion
Houston v. Schluntz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1968No. 7285PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILES, Judge.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Attaway et ux. v. Schluntz et al., La.App., 208 So.2d 332, the judgment of the trial court rejecting the demands *336of the plaintiff, Ralph D. Houston, individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor son, James F. Houston, against E. K. Schluntz and his public liability insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, is affirmed at his cost.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Attaway v. SchluntzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Attaway v. SchluntzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Houston v. SchluntzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968